Somewhere, Stravinsky was smiling, I feel certain.
Tonight was the 100th anniversary of the premiere of the composer's "Rite of Spring," a hundred years since the Paris performance that caused a near-riot.
And tonight was also the night that a reduced version got performed at Gallery 5 for a full, but enthusiastic crowd.
And by reduced, I mean taking a score that I had recently heard performed by 100 symphony musicians down to just one.
Daryl Tankersley had painstakingly spent the past year and a half reducing "Rite of Spring" for a single electric guitar.
Things were just gearing up when I arrived.
Daryl was also having an exhibition of his collages, which were hung on the walls around the room.
Miles Davis poured out of the speakers overhead.
Holmes and his lovely were there, along with another favorite musician and his main squeeze.
I said hello to a jazz critic, a jazz DJ, a couple of symphony musicians and a favorite comics illustrator.
As the bartender pointed out, if only all Gallery 5 shows had such an eclectic crowd.
After much mingling, the lights were lowered and things got started.
It was fascinating hearing the guitar stand in for bassoons and timpani as the piece moved from adoration of the earth through the ritual of abduction to dance of the earth.
The audience was rapt, following the intensity without a sound.
He'd warned us he would be taking a break after part one to re-tune and wipe some sweat.
As a music writer pointed out to me later, Stravinsky had written the piece with instruments alternating parts because certain passages were so strenuous to play.
All the more reason to be wowed by one person playing it solo.
When playing resumed, it was for the exalted sacrifice, whereby the tribal elders watch as the chosen young girl dances herself to death.
Pretty primitive for 1913.
But tonight, it was just wildly intensive guitar playing that delivered the revolutionary rhythm patterns that were so challenging for audiences to accept a century ago.
Tonight's crowd had no such problem, leaning forward and absorbing every note until he finished playing to prolonged applause and hooting.
As impressed as I'd been at the scope of a project that had occupied this musician for almost two years, for the 30-some minutes he was playing, all I could do was lose myself in the music.
Only in Richmond could I be lucky enough to spend the centennial of "Rite of Spring" in a converted firehouse listening to such a magical performance, linking us back to that fateful night in Paris.
It was dancing of the earth of the highest order and I can't imagine what could top it when the bicentennial rolls around.
Some people will always have Paris, but my rite of spring was Richmond.
Just as primal, but without the bad behavior of Parisians.
Happy 100th, Igor.
Showing posts with label rite of spring. Show all posts
Showing posts with label rite of spring. Show all posts
Thursday, May 30, 2013
Sunday, May 12, 2013
Fifths and Sacred Dances
The only thing missing was the rioting.
On this glorious spring afternoon, I was at CenterStage for the Richmond Symphony's program of "Musical Revolutionaries."
Our seats were in the nosebleed section, but given the $10 ticket price, neither me nor either of my companions was complaining about the height.
Hell, I've bought $10 seats that landed me in the very last row and this time there were two rows behind us, so it was plenty uptown for me.
Even from so far away, I spotted my favorite bass clarinet player, looking handsome and ready to play.
Likewise, the lanky bass player with whom I love to chat was holding up his large instrument (and no, that's not a metaphor although I feel sure he'd say it was).
The program began with Monteverdi's "Toccata and Ritornelli" from an opera, "Orfeo" he'd written in 1607.
Yea, that didn't mean anything to me, either.
Wait, wasn't that the year the colonists were landing in Jamestown?
The short piece was notable mainly for how the orchestra had to simulate the sounds of instruments no longer in use.
Fast forward 200 years for Beethoven's "Symphony No. 5," or as it was called in the '70s, "A fifth of Beethoven."
From the first distinctive four notes, da da da DA, I could only think of one thing.
Just how many cartoons have used this piece of music.
When the orchestra finished the four-movement piece, the audience rose to its feet for a standing ovation.
After intermission came the reason I was at CenterStage today: Stravinsky's "Rite of Spring."
This month is the centennial of the first performance of the composer's tradition-smashing work.
My only complaint was that the program, in describing it, referred to "the shear noise of new music."
Two of our group are serious language geeks, and that egregious error left us shaking our heads in disgust.
Perhaps I should volunteer my proofreading skills to the symphony.
But that aside, hearing "The Rite of Spring" performed live was a magical experience.
Just before it began, one of my companions began adjusting stuff on the floor, saying, "I need to clear the decks for toe-tapping."
Let's just say before long my toes, my legs and everything else was pulsating along with the pagan rhythms.
Conductor Steven Smith called the revolutionary piece of music a "sonic extravaganza," trying to prepare us for what we were about to hear.
And that was the music written for a ballet about a pagan rite, namely old men sitting around watching a young girl dance herself to death.
As you can imagine, that didn't go over terribly well in 1913.
Today, however, it was a tour de force beginning with a bassoon and moving through, according to Smith, revolutionary rhythmic patterns that sounded both tribal and primitive, evocations with which we're far more comfortable today than they were 100 years ago.
So instead of throwing catcalls and insults at the musicians, today's audience sat there raptly and when the piece ended, gave a prolonged standing ovation, topping even the one we'd given Beethoven's fifth.
Why riot when it's so much more satisfying to indulge your primal side?
On this glorious spring afternoon, I was at CenterStage for the Richmond Symphony's program of "Musical Revolutionaries."
Our seats were in the nosebleed section, but given the $10 ticket price, neither me nor either of my companions was complaining about the height.
Hell, I've bought $10 seats that landed me in the very last row and this time there were two rows behind us, so it was plenty uptown for me.
Even from so far away, I spotted my favorite bass clarinet player, looking handsome and ready to play.
Likewise, the lanky bass player with whom I love to chat was holding up his large instrument (and no, that's not a metaphor although I feel sure he'd say it was).
The program began with Monteverdi's "Toccata and Ritornelli" from an opera, "Orfeo" he'd written in 1607.
Yea, that didn't mean anything to me, either.
Wait, wasn't that the year the colonists were landing in Jamestown?
The short piece was notable mainly for how the orchestra had to simulate the sounds of instruments no longer in use.
Fast forward 200 years for Beethoven's "Symphony No. 5," or as it was called in the '70s, "A fifth of Beethoven."
From the first distinctive four notes, da da da DA, I could only think of one thing.
Just how many cartoons have used this piece of music.
When the orchestra finished the four-movement piece, the audience rose to its feet for a standing ovation.
After intermission came the reason I was at CenterStage today: Stravinsky's "Rite of Spring."
This month is the centennial of the first performance of the composer's tradition-smashing work.
My only complaint was that the program, in describing it, referred to "the shear noise of new music."
Two of our group are serious language geeks, and that egregious error left us shaking our heads in disgust.
Perhaps I should volunteer my proofreading skills to the symphony.
But that aside, hearing "The Rite of Spring" performed live was a magical experience.
Just before it began, one of my companions began adjusting stuff on the floor, saying, "I need to clear the decks for toe-tapping."
Let's just say before long my toes, my legs and everything else was pulsating along with the pagan rhythms.
Conductor Steven Smith called the revolutionary piece of music a "sonic extravaganza," trying to prepare us for what we were about to hear.
And that was the music written for a ballet about a pagan rite, namely old men sitting around watching a young girl dance herself to death.
As you can imagine, that didn't go over terribly well in 1913.
Today, however, it was a tour de force beginning with a bassoon and moving through, according to Smith, revolutionary rhythmic patterns that sounded both tribal and primitive, evocations with which we're far more comfortable today than they were 100 years ago.
So instead of throwing catcalls and insults at the musicians, today's audience sat there raptly and when the piece ended, gave a prolonged standing ovation, topping even the one we'd given Beethoven's fifth.
Why riot when it's so much more satisfying to indulge your primal side?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)